Skip to main content

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

The Roman Empire has been one of the most powerful, extensive and important in the history of Humanity.Many peoples fell under the yoke of Rome, and today you can still admire the architectural remains of a civilization that reached a splendor almost absolute.However, in the Roman Empire there were great differences between the different strata that made up the society.Although from the oldest civilizations there were already different orders or "classes", today we focus on the different social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Plebeians .

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

Social classes in the Roman Empire

The Roman civilization is one of the most complex societies of universal history.Given its long duration (since 8th century BC until the 5th century AD ) historians have divided the History of Rome into different historical periods: Monarchy, Republic of Empire .Today I propose you to enter the most splendid years of the Roman Empire ( sI and II BC .), But moving away from the great characters, to have a more global idea of ​​how this society was composed.

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

Painting of a woman of Patrician origin practicing music

Roman society was divided into different classes , with different civil and political rights and also economic differences .Let's see, then, what are the main social groups and some of its most relevant characteristics:

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricians, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Plebeians

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

The Patricios

It was called Patricios to the oldest families in Rome , who formed an aristocracy of landowners.They had all the privileges both fiscal, judicial, political and cultural.They were full citizens.The name of Patricios was given because it came from "father", in reference to the fact that they were children of the founding fathers of Rome.

At first the patricians were those who made up the Roman Senate , however, a cluster of scandals during the time of the Republic caused only a few patricians appointed by the emperor himself, will be part of the Senate and his own council personal.

It is possible to say that over time the patriciate was giving importance in favor of a certain sector of the commoners , who were acquiring important wealth and rights.of commoners ended up being greater than that of the patricians, and they even began to occupy important ranks in the army, something that had been destined exclusively for patricians.

Among the rights of patricians was to occupy the magistracies and important positions in the council of the emperor and in the Senate, to be heads of the Roman legions, they were authorized to take possession of the conquered lands, they could enter schools and circles of Priests, as well as to exercise the cult of the city.In addition, they had the right to have 3 names.

The Plebeians

That is how all those who were outside the Patrician group were called in primitive Rome.Originally lacked rights, but through centuries of lu chas social rights were recognized similar to those of the Patricios, among them being Roman citizens , electing representatives and having their own political institutions .

Among the commoners there were great economic differences, so that within the so-called commoners, the following groups can be distinguished: noblemen, gentlemen and clients .

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

Nobles : They were the richest commoners , who matched the patricians for his fortune and for occupying the most important political positions.

Knights : They were commoners with an intermediate fortune , who obtained for their work as merchants, farmers or professionals, came to occupy political positions of medium importance.

Clients : They were commoners who did not have their own resources and put themselves at the service of a patrician (to go to war, vote it in the elections).In return their employer gave them food and/or money.Over time, customers became increasingly impoverished, until they became in a mass of unemployed people easily manipulated for political purposes.

These three social groups formed the most favored sector pol It is economically and economically in the Roman society .On the other hand, other social groups are in lower economic conditions, being the lower strata of the Roman society. In the Roman Empire, members of other social classes could also be distinguished, although most, except slaves, were generally part of commoners.Let's see that other social groups existed during the empire apart from monarchs and emperors, patricians, knights and commoners.

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

Slaves

They had no rights of any kind.Normally they were prisoners of war.The number of slaves in Rome became enormous with the expansion of the Empire.They were forced to do the toughest jobs and ruin for life.You can say that your destiny depended on the be nevolence or cruelty of his master.Many of these slaves were used to satisfy the desire for fun of the Emperor and the people.

Slaves were the main actors of the "functions" that were performed in the Colosseum and Roman amphitheaters, where they often had to fight to the death between them, face warriors with armor and great swords, fight against wild animals or resist in the chariot races, among other niceties.It should be noted that during the time of the Empire the number of slaves and cruelty to them reached its maximum limits, reaching the point that some leaders decided to legislate against mistreatment of slaves.It is believed that at that time there were only almost 300,000 slaves in Rome, and that some of the richest families they could have 1,000.

More social classes in the Roman Empire

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

Honorary citizens : They were citizens who renounced their former nationality and were welcomed by the Empire in exchange for obtaining Roman nationality.

Members of the army : The members of the army had to undergo brutal training for 4 months to enter the body.Those who could not stand it were rejected.The tests consisted of traveling 30 kilometers in less of 5 hours.Then, they should do the same but provided with the regulatory armor s instruments of all kinds necessary to raise after each training day a camp that includes defensive barriers.In the beginning most of the army was formed by patricians or professional soldiers, but as the empire grew and problems too, it became necessary to get more and more effective, so plebeians began to be accepted, with what which the army underwent a certain devaluation.Even the commoners, in the period of decline of the patricians, became the most present social class in the Roman army.

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

Settlers : They could be considered as the intermediate step between slavery that kingdom during the Roman Empire and Feudalism that would happen to to dominate the Middle Ages.In the latter phases of the Empire, with the improved production systems and infrastructure, it became clear that Rome did not need so many slaves.This was how the liberation of many of them, which became free colonists , although generally very poor.Ultimately, these colonists began to live in freedom, but they had to continue working the land of the rich landowners to survive.In addition, in order to cultivate the land, they had to pay a fee or tax landowner.

On the other hand, the settlers had no right to hold any public office , and in the event that the owner sold their land to another landowner, the settler would also form part of the agreement, that is, would pass to another landowner.

Conclusions on social classes in the Roman Empire

It should be noted to end that the Roman Empire was marked by inequality between classes social, the luxury of some and the slavery of others, and also in the continuous tensions and struggles for power and rights between different classes, such as patricians and commoners.

The Roman Empire lasted more than one millennium, which also suffered numerous evolutions , both politically, economically or territorially, but also in relation to social classes.For example, some slaves could cease to be, or some commoners could become very important personalities, even close to the Emperor.

Women in the Roman Empire

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

We can consider that the women in the Roman Empire had a condition social in itself, regardless of whether the different circumstances of their birth could give them a greater decision power than others.Obviously, the possibilities, both socially and economically, for example, an empress, were not the same as those of a slave but, in any case, women were subject to some social conditions specific to their sex in Ancient Rome.

In Ancient Rome, women born in freedom were considered Roman citizens , but could not practice rights and duties that the same consideration was given to men.For example, they could not vote or hold any public office , except in the religious sphere and only in very specific positions, as is the case with the vestals.Likewise, women were subordinate to the legal authority of a pater families or guardian.

Although practically all family members were subordinate to the authority of the aforementioned pater families in major or minor, it is true that , except for very c cases On the other hand, women never achieved total independence, something that men could aspire to.In any case, it should be borne in mind that the Roman family was conceived as a collective and not as an individuality, so aspects such as marriages were always linked to the pater families and the family unit as a whole.In fact, Roman women always belonged to their family of origin , even after their marriage and moving to their household husband, divorce being possible.In any case, it was considered that women should always be under the legal protection of a man, who could be more or less strict, although they had freedom of action.

Social classes in the Roman Empire: Patricios, Noble Commoners and Gentlemen Commoners

In addition, it is also true that Roman laws protected the interests of the citizens, because could have p Properties, go to trials or even emancipate yourself if a very strict legal procedure was followed, something very different from what happened to women from other ancient cultures, such as the Greek or Mesopotamian.In any case, at different times in the long history of Rome, some norms related to women were varying, giving them greater or lesser freedom, for example, during the time of the first emperor, Augustus , during the latter century before our era, the conservative vision that he wanted to impose made him enact laws such as the one that forbade adult women to remarry or that penalized them by losing an important part of their property.we must take into account the period in which we move, although women were always in a plane of inequality with men, officially separated from all public performances and, with exceptions, linked to a greater or lesser extent to male authority.

In the case of the libertas , they had the same conditions as men in this same social situation, having more or less the same rights as women who were born free.Since the most common thing was that they did not have parents or that they were also slaves and, therefore, did not have citizen rights, the previous owner or employer could act as pater families in those legal matters that required their bond ulacion a uno.In the case of slaves, their case is practically equal to that of men, since neither of them had rights and were considered as mere material goods.

On the other hand, women could perform jobs and it was very common to see them do it from a certain social consideration because, although it is true that women linked to rich families did not usually perform work tasks, the rest did.The work they could do was very varied and it is known that there were Roman women who had trades traditionally linked to women's fields (such as maids, hairdressers, midwives, etc.), but also they could have a property business and There is news of women who became doctors or secretaries, to name a few examples.In the case of slaves, especially if they had acquired this condition after their birth, the work they used to perform depended on certain ta measure of their education and skills.

Slaves without education or training, as in the case of men, used to engage in manual tasks or, also, could be forced to prostitute themselves, but if they had a different formation, they could be teachers or, as has been shown recently, even gladiators.

Interesting links

Are you passionate about ancient history? Know everything about the great empires and civilizations that have populated the planet? In History Today Online we have many more articles for you:

If you liked the article, share it with your friends on social networks!

 

Bibliography:

  • CASIO DION, LUCIO.Roman History.Full work of Lucio Casio Dion
  • The Roman Empire of Pierre Grimal ISBN: 9788498929652

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jose Mauri Biography

José Mauri (Valencia, 1856-Havana, 1937) Spanish composer.Installed in Cuba for most of his life, he founded the conservatory that bears his name there (1914).His work includes numerous songs and the opera The Slave (1921).

Joseph Reinach Biography

Joseph Reinach (Paris, 1856-1921) French journalist.He started in the journalistic profession through the Parisian newspaper La République Française , where from 1877 he began to publish interesting political analyzes that placed him at the epicenter of French public life in the last quarter of the century XIX.He acquired such importance in such a short space of time that in 1881, following the proclamation in France of the Third Republic, President León Gambetta called him to his side to place all his trust in him and appoint him head of his secretariat. At only thirty years old (1886), he became editor-in-chief of La République Française .Once this position was released, he directed a noisy journalistic campaign from the pages of the newspaper against the nationalist and populist politics of Georges Boulanger (the " General Revanche ").With this and other similar matters of maximum national interest, Joseph Reinach continued to rise in French public life and, in 188...

Joseph H. Maclagan Wedderburn Biography

Joseph H.Maclagan Wedderburn (Forfar, 1882-Princeton, 1948) British mathematician.Professor at Princeton University, he was editor of the Proceedings of the Edinburgh mathematical society (1905-1909) and the Annals of mathematics (1912-1928).He stated a theorem ( Wedderburn's theorem ) according to which every finite field is commutative.

X-ray history

The X-rays were discovered in 1895 and from there they became a very revolutionary application in many branches of science, from astronomy to radiographs that we have not done so many times.the 120th anniversary of the X-rays knowing his inventor and the research that led him to such an important scientific advance. Article index Who invented the X-rays? The inventor or, rather, the person who discovered the X-rays was Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen , a German physicist who was focused on the field of electromagnetics Nothing else to present his discovery, Rontgen's theory received great attention from critics and public, and was translated into French, English or Russian. Although it is not a name as well known today as that of others you celebrate writers, the name of Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen is written in gold letters in the medical field, where he has had and has and numerous applications.The importance of his discovery was such in his day that he was the first Nobel Prize ...

Jose Maria Sanchez-Silva Biography

José María Sánchez-Silva (José María Sánchez-Silva and García-Morales; Madrid, 1911-2002) Spanish writer.He studied journalism at the El Debate School, linked to the Catholic Church, and soon became one of the young journalists who, during the 1940s, became champions of the Falangist ideology and the interests of the ecclesiastical hierarchy..His signature began to reach a certain resonance among the pages of the newspaper Arriba, the visible head of the official press, in which he was to hold the post of deputy director in 1949.He also displayed intense journalistic activity in other media related to his conservative ideology , like the Catholic newspaper Ya and the monarchic ABC. José María Sánchez-Silva After a series of narratives that went unnoticed, in 1953 he published Marcelino Pan and Vino , a novel that tells the story of an orphan boy who, taken in and raised by a community of friars, establishes a particular friendship relationship with an image of Christ crucified,...

Josef Hoffmann Biography

Josef Hoffmann (Pirnitz, 1870-Vienna, 1956) Austrian architect, decorator and urban planner.He was a disciple of O.Wagner and participated, along with J.M.Olbrich and other architects, in the creation of the avant-garde movement of the Secession (1897).His work is characterized by the careful treatment of the surfaces achieved through geometric decorations; The Stoclet Palace in Brussels stands out for its calculated elegance of style (1905-1911).

Alexandr Izvolski Biography

Alexandr Izvolski (Moscow, 1856-Paris, 1919) Russian politician and diplomat, main architect of the alliance between Russia and England in the years before the First World War. Alexandr Izvolski Educated at the Imperial Lyceum in Saint Petersburg, he soon held important diplomatic posts: he was Russian ambassador to the Vatican, Yugoslavia, Germany, Japan and Denmark.Between 1906 and 1910 he served as Minister of Foreign Affairs; after that he was appointed ambassador to France. In 1907, Izvolski signed a pact that strengthened the alliance between France and England against Germany.Thanks to this pact, the British and the Russians divided Persia, which was divided into three zones of influence: a British, a Russian and a neutral zone between the two (Afghanistan was under the protection of Great Britain).This pact, together with the Franco-Russian alliance of 1890 and the Anglo-French agreement of 1904, formed the embryo of what would later become the Triple Entente. In Oct...

Frédéric August Bartholdi Biography

Frédéric August Bartholdi (Colmar, 1834-Paris, 1904) French sculptor.He studied architecture in his hometown and later traveled to Paris to study painting; there he came into contact with the painter Ary Scheffer and the sculptors Jean-François Soitoux and Antoine Étex.He soon concentrated his efforts on sculpture, the art for which he would be best known.His works are characterized by monumentality and by large-scale commemorative pieces of historical and patriotic events.He also made works in honor of well-known personalities of the time. Inspired by the Lion of Lucerne , (1819-1821, Lucerne) monument erected in honor of the Swiss Guards of Louis XVI by Bertel Thorvaldsen (1770-1844), Bartholdi erected the gigantic Lion of Belfort (1880, Belfort).Although it was created for the cemetery in which the soldiers lay, it was placed on top of a hill from where you can see the entire city.The lion, which rises imposingly to repel the enemy's attack, contrasts with the dejected f...

Ian Richard Kyle Paisley Biography

Ian Richard Kyle Paisley (Belfast, 1926) Ulster ecclesiastic and politician.Founder of the Free Presbyterian Church of Northern Ireland (1951), he opposed the rapprochement between Protestantism and the Vatican and was against the civil rights movement.Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party, he rallied Protestant extremists around him in his campaigns against the Catholics of Ulster.Member of the Assembly of Northern Ireland (1973-1974) and of the British Parliament since 1970.Founder of the paramilitary group Ulster Defense Association (1981), between 1990 and 1994 he boycotted the peace talks on several occasions with the British government.In 1999 he was elected MEP.